These are my thoughts to follow-up on the
Eating Locally posts.
The economic boom of China is evidence that capitalism rules. It's not just capitalism but global capitalism. Countries from around the globe are flocking to China to invest and make it part of their global commodity chain. For example, Norway is shipping its salmon or mackeral for processing in China before shipping it elsewhere for packing. It's basically about increasing profit margins - lust and greed :-)
Globalisation, I believe, has speeded up the destruction of the environment. Before global capitalism, people would eat locally. I remember when our family was in the UK in the 70s, our only fruit were seasonal apples, strawberries, pears and other berries. We hardly had bananas or melons. Now with the initiatives of the World Trade Organisation and free trade agreements, countries are pulling down trade barriers, which basically means everyone and anyone can come and invest in the country. With the increased affluence we get increased consumption. Using China as an example it definitely doesn;t look sustainable:
a) it now eats 50% of the world's pork, cement
b) consumes one third of the world's steel
c) consumes a quarter of its aluminium
d) spends 35 times more on imports of soya beans and crude oil compared with 1999
e) has swalloed over 4/5 of the increase in the world's copper supply since 2000
f) its steelmaking industry uses 16% of China's power (vs. 10% for all of China's households combined)
g) pollution amounts to 10% of its GDP
Okay, so if capitalism is bad for the environment, should we turn to socialism? In theory, it should be better for the environment, but by looking at what was the former USSR and the former eastern bloc of Europe, the environment wasn't better off either.
There is one success story though: Cuba. Cuba is still communist and under trade sanctions from their arch-enemy, USA. With the collapse of USSR, Cuba literally had no friends left and no economic support. What to do? They ended up turning to
organic agriculture and urban agriculture. They have been successful. According to the World Wildlife Fund’s (WWF) The Living Planet Report 2006, Cuba is the only country in the world that enjoys sustainable development (commitment to improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems). Castro must be laughing at the USA!. They had a GDP of ~12% in 2006, the highest in the Latin American region.
At the 48th anniversary of Cuba's revolution, Castro said: "Humanity is going through difficult times, marked by wars and dangers that arise everywhere, plus a non-stop consumption process — typical of the globalized imperialist system — which is exhausting important natural resources and polluting the environment. That alone justifies our heroic struggle."
With Castro handing over his leadership to another, I wonder whether the USA will lift the trade embargo. Lifting the embargo will probably be the beginning of the end of this success story. I can imagine the Starbucks and McDs etc invading the Cuban market as the "liberators", and the ideals of capitalism....