Copenhagen is just around the corner, and there's still no agreement on how it's going to be financed. I can't believe that the countries are still in disagreement about who is going to pay for what. They sound like a family bickering over inheritance! It will cost
$100 billion a year by 2020 to fund the agreement! Some economists say that it would even cost closer to a trillion.
The UN IPCC reports indicate that the developing countries are the most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. They also lack of technology, funds and policy frameworks to face the challenge, unlike the developed countries. This is deja vu. With other environmental issues (see below), the developed nations have the money and the know how to tackle them, but for some developing nations just spending the equivalent amount could wipe out any hard earned economic gains. It's time to help each other out, or else some will be left behind!
a) A
2008 UNEP report highlighted that cities are getting darker, as a result of atmospheric brown clouds arising from the burning of fossil fuels and biomass. Hot spots include Bangkok, Beijing, Dhaka, Karachi, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi, Seoul, Shanghai and Shenzhen.
b) The World Bank estimates that in developing countries, it is common for towns to spend 20-50 percent of their available budget on solid waste management. In low-income countries, collection alone drains up 80-90 percent of municipal solid waste management budget. This is something that developed nations take for granted and is probably not something we think about when we pay the bills. In fact, some people in developing nations still do open burning possibly because the infrastructure for waste collection and disposal is not ready yet. I think this would apply to water / sewage treatment too.